In last week’s blog post I spoke of how income is an important determinant of health. I didn’t, however, give examples of how this is true. To elaborate on this, I will speak of last week’s lecture material from FNN 400 and from FND 401 (Social & Cultural Dimensions of Food).
In FND 401, I learned about “health disparity” and “health inequity”, where health disparity is defined as a “disproportionate disease burden among population groups”, while health inequities are the “causes of health disparities”. This relates to last week’s lecture on social inequities. The primary inequity boils down, once again, to income. There is a large gap between the very poor and the very rich, which is becoming bigger as time progresses. There have been attempts made to decrease this gap by increasing minimum wages. This, however, is insufficient. What other things can we do to make all equal, to eliminate the gap between the Rich and Poor, and thus increase the health in the lower socio-demographics? In class we spoke of also increasing social assistance, make food, housing and day care more affordable, and increase health and recreational activities. However, who will pay for all of this? Will the Rich be good Samaritans and put more money into these concepts? One way this can potential happen would be to speak to the emotions of the Rich.
If we can’t reduce the social inequalities, we must find a way to reduce these relationships. The relationships explored in class included those between income inequalities and Physical Health, Mental Health, Obesity, Violence, and Teenage Births.
Sources:
FNN 400 lecture notes, week 5
FND 401 lecture notes
No comments:
Post a Comment